alt9 years ago, on 30 November 2002 in Kyiv was established Democratic Organization "Ukrainian National Rada" ("UNR").
Following are the actual interview for portal
The Will of the People Head to "UNR" Yuriy PALCHUKOVSKYI

The situation in Ukraine - disturbing. What is the root of all our troubles?

- Decoupling of democratic forces allows the authorities to destroy Ukraine. Even the title of power "Party of Regions," the idea of ​​separation of the Ukrainian nation.
 

If you recall the story (even the latest, since UPR), it can be argued that the defeat of all national-democratic forces - a natural consequence of chronic discord. A major reason for this contention, in my opinion, only two - is ambitious leaders and their fear of the authorities.
When the stake the fate of Ukraine, we must be guided by it, and not their own interests and overcome the fear shodnishnoyu power, which, like fire, afraid of unification of the nation.

One way out - to unite Ukrainian society.
Political leaders must reject political ambitions and think about the state, but the idea of ​​unification of the nation to raise the level of the national idea (strategic goal of the nation). Unfortunately, his time, neither Kuchma nor Yushchenko failed to do so.
All differences are minor, if the national idea today is the unity of the Ukrainian nation!

The name "Ukrainian National Rada" is quite responsible. Is it true of his time, was chosen goal and strategy to "UNR"?

- To implement the "formula of the Ukrainian nation" at the Forum of Democratic Forces (Kyiv, October 2002) it was decided to establish a permanent Conciliation body Democratic Forces - Ukrainian Coordinating Council. This format is rallying public and political asset Ukraine was supported by leaders of 40 democratic forces. Therefore, 30 November 2002 in Kiev House of teachers to implement the decision of the Forum was established Democratic Association "Ukrainian National Council," co-ordinating body which is the Ukrainian Coordinating Council "(UNC). The urgency of this format confirms today.

What do you think showed the 20 years after the restoration of Ukraine's independence?

- They showed the weakness of the Ukrainian elite, the low level of political culture, the inability to adequately express the will of the people. And the moral level politicians often borders on treason and zaprodanstvom. So they continue to create "under a" political force, the misleading and disorient the citizens of Ukraine.

Do not justify yourself and following the formation of a collective NKZU, RCD, and others. They have from the outset doomed to self-liquidation, because it is - amorphous, artificial projects, where there are no simple and clear rules of coordinated interaction. And without rules does not occur even sports games. It's fashionable to call such projects "fronts" (and now politicians talk about a common front of democratic forces).
The real Ukrainian is not peculiar to this "militant" rhetoric. Suffice it to say the Orange Revolution, which was peaceful, civilized mechanism for regime change. (Sadly, though, that changed the face of power, it has not changed the system of government. In fact, according to Einstein aptly put, "no problem can not be solved at the same level at which it occurred").
In addition, various "fronts" - a kind of situational formations, which I have already spoken. Europe is making fun of us: and what is it 20 years "viynuyut" rather than solve the eternal problem of leadership and pull together a society of "pit."

Therefore, all temporary formation under a leader or in elections - artificial and not sincere. At the time, Yushchenko promised Ukrainian holiday: "If we do not offer people ideas that can combine our project (" Our Ukraine ") scattered from him only memories remain." Well, not offered. Therefore, scattered. Moreover, it is Yushchenko made the main contribution that the Ukrainian society today covered the epidemic of indifference.
Most political leaders not only indifferent to the issue of power. They control the ambition, selfishness, narcissism.

Why do these people become leaders? 

- Such "public figures" gives rise to the existing political system. Ignoring the Constitution, laws of Ukraine, constitutional rights, they only seek to resolve their oligarchic objectives aimed at redistribution of power, property, lobbying oligarchic-clan interests.
Today's leaders of political parties are actively trying to find their place in the next higher authority. Their thoughts and actions are not aimed at changing the system of government (for them when the system is very comfortable), and how to get back into Parliament. Ix The people least interested in, although on various talk shows they are very concerned about his fate.
So, the situation in Ukraine eloquently proves that the existing system of power itself exhausted.

And what to do in this situation?

 - It's time to realize that no, a separate, political party to change this system can not afford. Only the people can change the system of civilized government. He only needs to provide a mechanism.
   There are three ways to change:

1. The evolutionary (long, gradual, small constantly changing), which is unacceptable in the modern information society, with rapid development.

2. Revolutionary (rapid, radical change), which usually has unintended consequences (not excluding tragic). Also, make one revolution, and they enjoy the fruits of others.

3. Transformation - fast enough civilized system changes made by the united civilized nation (not to be confused with an anti haphazard reforms, which carries the current government).

Ukraine as a civilized European country with a highly intellectual tolerant nation inherent in this third way. Ukrainian nation is wiser than the politicians who are trying to lower her to his level.

I believe in the wisdom of the Ukrainian nation!

Thanks for the interview. 

Коментарі

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh